MEN CANNOT GET PREGNANT!
Pregnant man emoji? Sign here to end this madness
Pregnant man emoji? Sign here to end this madness
The Unicode Consortium, the association that regulates text characters on the internet, has announced a new set of emoji to be used in the upcoming Unicode 14.0 for all smartphones. It includes the emoji of 'a pregnant man'.
Following the introduction of the transgender flag, the man in a wedding veil and the gender-neutral Father Christmas, the international Unicode team has decided to encode yet another folly of the gender frontier, namely the image of those transgender people who identify as "daddy seahorse".
Obviously, these are not men, but transgender women who apparently - thanks to the cyclical (and very dangerous) intake of drugs and hormones - look like men, but in the end turn out to be biologically women (to the point of getting pregnant).
The decision to introduce the emoji of a 'pregnant man' is part of a wider goal to make all emoji 'gender neutral', i.e. fluid, asexual.
Activists are desperate to bring digital communication into line with the aims and objectives of the LGBTQ political agenda and accompanying political correctness that wants to impose the absurdity of sexual indifferentism on the world, under the guise of inclusivity.
But the emoji of a "pregnant man" does not represent any inclusivity - only madness and an attack on the role of women and the uniqueness of motherhood.
Jeremy Burge, one of Emojipedia's archive managers, explained that "almost all emoji can have a gender-neutral option by default, with the option to use a woman or a man where relevant".
But what on earth would be relevant about a man giving birth?
When has motherhood ever been a relevant experience for men? There isn't a single medical textbook that details how men give birth because it simply doesn't happen!
This is an offence against millions of women and the sacredness of motherhood and it is deliberately targeted to change the mindsets and consciences of the millions of schoolchildren and young people who constantly use smartphones to communicate with each other.
We have had enough of these schizophrenic lies produced by gender ideology!
Sign the petition now and ensure that this emoji does not pass the Unicom committee's scrutiny.
Complete your signature
Sign this petition now!
There is no such thing as a 'pregnant man'!
For the attention of Mark Davis, CLDR-TC Chair, & Emoji Subcommittee Chair at the Unicode Consortium,
Dear Mark Davis,
As a citizen and a daily user of the platforms that use your emoji, I am deeply dismayed by the news that the Unicom Consortium will consider incorporating the emoji of a "pregnant man".
When I read the news I couldn't believe it!
Obviously these are not men, but transgender men who apparently - thanks to the cyclical (and very dangerous) intake of drugs and hormones - look like men, but are still biologically female as evidenced by their pregnancy.
This image is a schizophrenic lie, as no man can give birth!
The only real intent of such an emoji is to validate a type of symbolism that respects LGBTQ propaganda and gender ideology which aims to redefine society's understanding of sex and sexuality and to erase the vital role of women when it comes to pregnancy, childbirth and child-rearing.
The proposed emoji constitutes an offence to millions of women and is an affront to motherhood (sacred to many cultures and religions). It is deliberately designed to change the mindset and conscience of the millions of schoolchildren and young people who constantly use smartphones to communicate with each other.
The emoji of a 'pregnant man' represents no inclusivity - only madness and an attack on the role of women and the uniqueness of motherhood and the sacredness attributed to it by many religions around the world.
We demand that the pregnant man emoji is not approved because:
A. It cannot meet the standards required by Unicom's selection process
B. It would represent a very small minority but would offend the majority of women and motherhood itself, destroying its primordial concept
C. It makes the achievement of women's rights and pink quotas indifferent to differences
D. It offends the sacred view of motherhood of many religions
There is no such thing as a 'pregnant man'!
For the attention of Mark Davis, CLDR-TC Chair, & Emoji Subcommittee Chair at the Unicode Consortium,
Dear Mark Davis,
As a citizen and a daily user of the platforms that use your emoji, I am deeply dismayed by the news that the Unicom Consortium will consider incorporating the emoji of a "pregnant man".
When I read the news I couldn't believe it!
Obviously these are not men, but transgender men who apparently - thanks to the cyclical (and very dangerous) intake of drugs and hormones - look like men, but are still biologically female as evidenced by their pregnancy.
This image is a schizophrenic lie, as no man can give birth!
The only real intent of such an emoji is to validate a type of symbolism that respects LGBTQ propaganda and gender ideology which aims to redefine society's understanding of sex and sexuality and to erase the vital role of women when it comes to pregnancy, childbirth and child-rearing.
The proposed emoji constitutes an offence to millions of women and is an affront to motherhood (sacred to many cultures and religions). It is deliberately designed to change the mindset and conscience of the millions of schoolchildren and young people who constantly use smartphones to communicate with each other.
The emoji of a 'pregnant man' represents no inclusivity - only madness and an attack on the role of women and the uniqueness of motherhood and the sacredness attributed to it by many religions around the world.
We demand that the pregnant man emoji is not approved because:
A. It cannot meet the standards required by Unicom's selection process
B. It would represent a very small minority but would offend the majority of women and motherhood itself, destroying its primordial concept
C. It makes the achievement of women's rights and pink quotas indifferent to differences
D. It offends the sacred view of motherhood of many religions
