Petition to: Republican Governor's Association - rga.org
Governors: Visibly base mandates on ALL the science. Sponsor a Forum where Doctors can Interact without fear of Censorship.
Governors: Visibly base mandates on ALL the science. Sponsor a Forum where Doctors can Interact without fear of Censorship.
Is there any website in the world where doctors on all sides of the covid controversy can interact with each other, balance one another, and correct each other, without fear of censorship? Which governors treat as a knowledge base upon which to base emergency mandates? And where curious voters like me can go to see if the governor's guidance is based on all the science, not just the half that has survived medically unqualified censors?
The threat is far greater than medical. Censorship, unchecked, of the scientific basis for restrictions on our freedoms, is a profound threat to all our freedoms. To the extent we lose freedom, health systems crumble, if health even still matters.
To the extent mainstream and social media censorship is bypassed on any important matter, there is potential to profoundly neutralize censorship on all subjects.
Can any true doctor support mandates crafted in a culture of censorship? Don't doctors warn of the side effects of their drugs and surgeries? What if a hospital administrator banned informed consent, and blocked doctors from talking to their patients ever again if they are caught explaining side effects? Like the medically challenged censors on social media closing the accounts of many doctors who have tried to inform patients and voters?
If you believe everyone should take the shots and wear the masks because of evidence that they are effective, and I resiste because of evidence that they are ineffective, surely our differences are not irreconcilable. Join me in neutralizing the censorship, so we can both look at all the evidence - together. Let's neutralize the medically illiterate censors of emminent medical testimony, so that true science can guide us.
Complete your signature
Sign this petition now!
Petition to: Republican Governor's Association - rga.org
Visibly base your emergency mandates on ALL the science, by inviting experts on all sides of any controversy to interact with each other without fear of censorship in a forum on your official website. Ask them to use language understandable to political leaders and voters, because you will make their testimony freely available to the public, and it will help guide your emergency mandates and guidelines.
WHY? Don't appear to base emergency mandates on less than all the evidence. Don't just cite the CDC or your state health director. Juries don't reach a verdict before all the witnesses are heard. Neither should you seem to. Prosecutors don't get to censor witnesses for the defense, labeling them as "disinformation" before they are even heard. Neither should you appear to limit your knowledge base to what is left over after medically illiterate media editors censor evidence they don't have enough education to understand.
Proverbs 18:13 He that giveth sentence in a matter before he hear it, (makes decisions before all the evidence has been presented), it is folly and shame unto him.
The website should invite the posting of all evidence, with a rank boost for experts who address counter claims, who respond to questions from politicians, and to questions from voters who show, by submitting their questions in the form of petitions, that their questions interest several voters.
The threat is far greater than medical. Censorship, unchecked, of the scientific basis for restrictions on our freedoms, is a profound threat to all our freedoms. To the extent we lose freedom, health systems crumble, if health even still matters. To the extent mainstream and social media censorship is bypassed on any important matter, there is potential to profoundly neutralize censorship on all subjects. When a witness in court is proved to have lied on any topic, his credibility as a witness is impeached on every topic. Attorneys test the credibility of witnesses on topics which juries don’t care about but which can be verified, to see if we can trust their testimony on matters we can’t otherwise verify but that we care about.
When the purveyors of “disinformation” labels are proved to be not merely uneducated but liars, their every subsequent use of the label will only produce laughter. And every future publisher is served notice that if he dares exercise censorship powers in a way that misdirects government policy, the people have a tool to not only bypass his censorship but to neutralize his whole publication.
For suggested bill language to amend your Emergency Powers laws, see: http://savetheworld.saltshaker.us/wiki/Cure_for_Covid_Censors#How_any_st...
Petition to: Republican Governor's Association - rga.org
Visibly base your emergency mandates on ALL the science, by inviting experts on all sides of any controversy to interact with each other without fear of censorship in a forum on your official website. Ask them to use language understandable to political leaders and voters, because you will make their testimony freely available to the public, and it will help guide your emergency mandates and guidelines.
WHY? Don't appear to base emergency mandates on less than all the evidence. Don't just cite the CDC or your state health director. Juries don't reach a verdict before all the witnesses are heard. Neither should you seem to. Prosecutors don't get to censor witnesses for the defense, labeling them as "disinformation" before they are even heard. Neither should you appear to limit your knowledge base to what is left over after medically illiterate media editors censor evidence they don't have enough education to understand.
Proverbs 18:13 He that giveth sentence in a matter before he hear it, (makes decisions before all the evidence has been presented), it is folly and shame unto him.
The website should invite the posting of all evidence, with a rank boost for experts who address counter claims, who respond to questions from politicians, and to questions from voters who show, by submitting their questions in the form of petitions, that their questions interest several voters.
The threat is far greater than medical. Censorship, unchecked, of the scientific basis for restrictions on our freedoms, is a profound threat to all our freedoms. To the extent we lose freedom, health systems crumble, if health even still matters. To the extent mainstream and social media censorship is bypassed on any important matter, there is potential to profoundly neutralize censorship on all subjects. When a witness in court is proved to have lied on any topic, his credibility as a witness is impeached on every topic. Attorneys test the credibility of witnesses on topics which juries don’t care about but which can be verified, to see if we can trust their testimony on matters we can’t otherwise verify but that we care about.
When the purveyors of “disinformation” labels are proved to be not merely uneducated but liars, their every subsequent use of the label will only produce laughter. And every future publisher is served notice that if he dares exercise censorship powers in a way that misdirects government policy, the people have a tool to not only bypass his censorship but to neutralize his whole publication.
For suggested bill language to amend your Emergency Powers laws, see: http://savetheworld.saltshaker.us/wiki/Cure_for_Covid_Censors#How_any_st...
